Apple’s long-rumoured foldable iPhone could finally become a reality if a recently awarded patent is any indication. This patent hints at a revolutionary self-healing screen.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      advertising propaganda

      Well that’s just redundant! I see Samsung holds this patent, I’m just wondering if they have this on any of their fold line of products.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thanks. I’m not exactly shocked to see this kind sensationalism in tech reporting, dumb.

          • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’ve read through the above Samsung patent and the Apples one. The one main difference I found was that Apple is talking about a heating layer between the other layer in the display that can initiate the selfhealing process (which could be initiated by the user, on schedule, or while charging the battery). I haven’t see a mention of such thing in the Samsung patent. Plus, Apples patent doesn’t seem to go into detail regarding the materials of the layer, only that it can be made out of „suitable materials”.

              • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t think they mention any material specifically, only „materials with selfhealing properties”. They leave it „open to interpretation” lol

    • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can they actually do „nothing new”? We’re talking about a patent here that they were granted. Aren’t patents by definition about something new?

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ideally. I literally just linked prior art though, their patent is invalid.

    • kirklennon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apple made no announcement or advertisement of any sort. Government patent examiners, after careful review, determined this is a novel invention or improvement. It’s not possible for your comment to be any more literally wrong than it is.

      • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        It feels like… „selfhealing? I heard that before. Apple? Ah yes, don’t like. Apple does nothing new and here is a patent that has the word selfhealing in it too”