I’ve been using this search engine and I have to say I’m absolutely in love with it.

Search results are great, Google level even. Can’t tell you how happy I am after trying multiple privacy oriented engines and always feeling underwhelmed with them.

Have you tried it? What are your thoughts on it?

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I stumbled onto some comments about Kagi angling to become an AI-first search engine that actually brags about putting you in a filter bubble. From Kagi’s manifesto:

    In the future, instead of everyone sharing the same search engine, you’ll have your completely individual, personalized Mike or Julia or Jarvis - the AI. Instead of being scared to share information with it, you will volunteer your data, knowing its incentives align with yours.

    One YouTube video suggests a grim future: “Everybody has a feed uniquely tailored to them. Nobody talks about their favorite YouTubers anymore, because everybody watches different content farms. All the real creators quit a long time ago.”

    Food for thought. I don’t like the idea of these filter bubbles.


    ETA: I didn’t realize it at the time but they also promise data collection for

    • Political echo chambers: “But there will also be search companions with different abilities… You could customize an AI to be conservative or liberal”
    • Corporate brand loyalty: “Ask it for a good coffee maker, and it’ll recommend choices within your budget from your favorite brands”

    If you’re looking for an open source search engine that’s building its own data set, one exists (and it’s totally open source and free).

    https://stract.com/

    If you’re looking for something that collates other engines’ contents, SearXNG is also open source and free.

    https://searx.space

    Kagi isn’t really unique in any way here; their most unique quality appears to be linking your searches to an account, requesting money, and promising not to sell your data at a later date.

  • bitduck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve had better results than on Google in many cases. Also leaves DDG and other privacy relevant alternatives in the dust.

    But, unless you are a power user it’s hard to justify the cost. Very pricey.

    • Dirk Darkly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The starter tier is only $5/month for 300 searches, which is more than enough for your average user.

      I can get not wanting to pay for search, but I wouldn’t call $5 “very pricey”. In fact, I’d be so bold as to call it reasonable.

      • million@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe I am not average but I blow past 300 pretty easily. I also think you may underestimating how much people search on their phones.

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Same here. I tried on the starter plan but had to upgrade. According to my account I have made 802 searches since January 4th. So 17.4 searches a day on average. This means that for a 31 day month I am looking at 620 searches.

          I am also a heavy user of bookmarks and browser history. So I don’t rely on search to open specific sites (like searching for “facebook” which is one of Google’s most popular queries). So someone who is in the habit of using search for direct navigation is probably going to be a good chunk higher.

          That being said I work on the computer and do a fair number of searches for my job. So I can believe that a light user is pretty comfortable at 300 searches a month. But moderate searches or people who use the search engine for navigation will need the unlimited plan.

      • force@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have 2000 searches in the past 7 days… 300 searches a month seems so miniscule

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    From my brief interactions with the dev I believe they’re doing things the very hard way when it comes to indexing.

    It might be the only choice once AI poisoning becomes prolific. It’s already corrupted the niche topics and soon it may overwhelm the topics with more human eyes on it.