• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    It actually did, solve it, unironically. The concern was that Microsoft was going to de facto take over the HTML standard and make it so that you had to use Internet Explorer and proprietary Microsoft extensions if you wanted to browse the web, eliminating all competition.

    Now, more than 20 years later, Internet Explorer is defunct. Microsoft’s current browser is built on Chromium, an open source engine that was created by one of its competitors. If anything it’s Google that’s now the problematic one.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This happened in 2009, when IE had a market share of 56% and declining. IE is (arguably) defunct because it sucked, not because of a one-time, court-mandated popup.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Back then Chrome didn’t exist and they didn’t implement the pop up, just assigned some overview and opened some APIs.

          However, the DOJ did not require Microsoft to change any of its code nor did it prevent Microsoft from tying other software with Windows in the future.

          The popup came in 2009.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Seems to me they continued to take actions in 2009 as a result of their loss in 2001. “Some overview” continued after the case was decided. Unless there was a subsequent court case I’m unaware of?