• return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The explanation:

    Flynn has been a generous donor to Newsom’s political campaigns, including contributing $100,000 to fight a failed recall effort against the governor. Bloomberg reported that the two men attended the same high school. Flynn also acquired a resort managed by Newsom’s hospitality business in 2014, but terminated the management contract about a year after the purchase, according to the news outlet.

    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-02-29/newsoms-office-calls-allegations-about-panera-bread-franchisee-absurd-says-company-is-not-exempt-from-law

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Because unfortunately, both sides are bad and one side is leaning hard on the other side being so off-the-rails they’re openly ranting about how badly they want to lock up and kill minorities.

        If you don’t see how the absolute deranged criminality of the right is helping change expectations about what corruption is, you’re naive.

        Literally, your post proves it, you’re more concerned with how it will affect people who see criminality and corruption on both sides, instead of admitting “Yeah, both sides do corrupt shit, but it’s firmly clear one side is off the rails and readily wants to hurt people.” It’s really easy to not have to offer anything of substance to your constituents if all you have to say is “The other guys literally want to kill you” and you’re being honest when you say it.

        Your comment is literally an example of letting it slide. “That is unfortunate.” No, its grifting and accepting bribery to carve out an exception for your fucking buddy, something you’d probably be screaming fucking bloody murder about if it was a Republican doing it. Guess what, we can cry bloody murder about both and not act like it’s time to just let corruption happen because it isn’t as bad as the other sides corruption.

        What a joke.

        • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I made my comment 2 minutes before yours so it’s wild to me that you read the real reason and still threw a fit with that wall of text. Y’all just live on outrage, huh?

          This dude owns way more than just a few Panera bread and he was literally just trying to follow the law and even so he decided to go ahead and pay them anyways even though according to the lawyers, he probably could have gotten away with it but you’re right bOtH SiDeS ArE tHE sAmE

          • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Random Internet Commenter Actually Reads the Response Challenge: Impossible.

            If all you really took from it is “Both sides are the same” and not that “criminality actually has grades, and treating small crimes like they don’t matter because big crimes exist is a fallacy” then you’re an idiot.

            • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Random Internet commenter so desperate to hate Democrats he has to go after donors challenge: Super Possible.

              • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Shucky darn, how awful it is of me to critique the people I vote for.

                I forgot, we’re all supposed to be cult members who never question authority… Wait a minute that sounds all too familiar…

                Maybe we shouldn’t be angling to be just like the MAGA idiots in justifying our sides’ criminality.

                • atp2112@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  But if we criticize their criminality and hypocrisy, then they’ll lose.

                  They certainly won’t lose because of said criminality and hypocrisy, no. It’s because we couldn’t shut the fuck up and gawk at the other side

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Both sides are bad.

        They’re just looking out for different rich people.

        People say voting 3rd party is a waste, but voting democrat just slows the loss.

        Losing is still losing, lol.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Absolute red meat for both-sides-are-bad politics.

        Not exactly a secret that local economic interests dictate policies to career climbers in the political scene. This isn’t even a “both sides” thing. Its a “how does a democracy actually work in practice” thing. The Whigs operate like this. The UK Tories and Labour operate like this. The German Greens and the Spanish People’s Party operate like this. Its the baseline of liberal democracy the world over.