Sorry if this is off topic, I don’t mean to stir a shitstorm. I just seem to hear barbs about Pixelfed developer dansup’s online behaviour every now and then, but no one ever comes out and make clear what the trouble is.

I guess it’s a legitimate complaint that he holds out on open sourcing projects, and keeps them close to his chest rather than distributing workloads. Given he’s currently developing Pixelfed and Loops and a messenger called Sup, I can understand the worry that he’ll hit a figurative wall and take all projects down with him…

So I found this open letter just now as I were trying to get to the bottom of it, and I genuinely can’t tell if this is what people have been growling about?

The above link is to the “appendix” where the anonymous authors appear to show receipts for the behaviour they flag. In shorter form, from the letter itself:

dansup, the maintainer of Pixelfed, Loops (which NLnet helps fund), and FediDB, among others, is a dangerous force in the fediverse community. With a follower count of over 22 thousand, he has repeatedly shown himself to be hostile to fellow FOSS fediverse developers, have a lack of care for open-sourcing his work, and be in favour of injecting the fediverse with advertisements. He has also proved himself to be prone to conspiratorial thinking, regrettable public statements, and embarrassingly public meltdowns.

Somebody tell me what is going on here?

[edited for typos]

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    From the top level of this: An open letter to NLnet to pull funding from development of Loops

    Conflict of interest

    This open letter has been authored by contributors who wish to remain anonymous. The authors, as well as some of the undersigned, are friends and acquaintances of hazycora, and as such, we acknowledge any potential conflicts of interest stemming from our relationship.

    I don’t know either party but from the information made public it looks like dansup has acted like a dick and fallen out with hazycora and the drama has escalated hard.

    From what I’ve observed dansup has been going full tilt to get Loops done because of the issues with TikTok and he is not great at delegating or really dealing with people. However, it would be a shame for such vital projects to have their funding cut but, equally, if I was in charge of those grants I’d be worried about dansup burning out and progress stalling. So it should be a requirement that all this is made open source as a priority, with a short to medium term goal being to have these projects run by a group of people to ensure the future and avoid similar issues going forward.

  • spaduf@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Dansup absolutely suffers from the instinct of not open sourcing stuff until it’s fairly late in the stage of being an MVP, but I think that’s largely because he’s learning these technologies as he goes and is afraid of criticism on that front. Personally, however, I do not think it is the case that he does not believe in the Open Source project. I also trust him when he says he’s working towards a nonprofit to distribute the load. It seems his first steps are to get funding via kickstarter to quit his job, and then I imagine organizing a nonprofit structure is next.

  • Ziggurat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    While we do Drama about [Insert open source developper name here] we have open and closeted nazi owning social media and big software companies. So I think we should better focus on them than on whatever Drama in the FOSS world

    • Kat@orbi.camp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eh, the open source community can worry about the open source community. Those other things don’t mean we have to put on horse blinders to others bringing awareness. No need to be dismissive.

      • Kichae@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        True. But we are not the open source community. And the fediverse is not inherently open source by nature. ActivityPub is designed to be used by anyone.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is this not relevant, since this person is a linchpin in creating federated alternatives to those social media sites? And if he fails he drags them all down.

      • haverholm@kbin.earthOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        You both have fair points, but I favour taking the broad view rather than hyperfocusing on one single, worst of class supervillain. We can do both.

  • caos@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know how big the dependency is and what the internal structures are like. I only remember that 2-3 years ago there was a message from him saying that he had some kind of burn-out and therefore needed a break of several months.

    Since I neither use Pixelfed nor am the target group of Loops, I have not looked into the details, but there have already been some discussions and criticism of the ‘strange’ terms of use with regard to Loops, see here: https://bajsicki.com/blog/loops-video-terms/

    • haverholm@kbin.earthOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, you’re not wrong. The difference is, Mullenweg didn’t really melt down until his project had made it financially (and was fully open source).

    • haverholm@kbin.earthOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t want to say either way because I’m just observing from the sideline, but I’m trying to find context for what bubbles to the surface.

      I don’t think anyone can argue that he works harder than most, maybe juggles a few too many projects for one man? Then he goes online and checks his better judgement at the door 🤷

    • haverholm@kbin.earthOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, that would be the New Year’s meltdown referenced, I guess. So is there bottled up crazy behind every deleted toot of his? Should we be apprehensive about using his projects?

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Should we be apprehensive about using his projects?

        I mean, we certainly aren’t, as evidenced by the fact that even with the whole power of numbers and community, an alternative hasn’t sprung up yet. And that’s the thing. Dansup is walking; most of everyone else is talking (shit).

      • shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Should we be apprehensive about using his projects?

        The majority of [ gestures vaguely ] is created and maintained by individuals with varying levels of crazy. You think the six COBOL developers holding up every bank on the planet are totally sane and hinged?