• BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    “Time to switch to uBlock Lite or another ad blocker”

    No. Time to switch to Firefox or derivative such as Librewolf.

    • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      when I swapped my laptops, I already had chrome on the newer ones which I’m still using, but when I heard about this ublock origin saga, I started putting all my passwords in protonpass, and customised my Firefox install to my liking, CSS and everything. All ready to switch now, and I’m gonna be thanking my past self profusely for actually choosing to switch instead of vegetating.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unfortunately I’m stuck with Chrome at work so having something like Ublock Lite available is somewhat helpful. I just hope it still blocks youtube ads because they’re the worst.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I strongly suspect that is exactly what they’re trying to stop.

      • Qkall@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        ah you too work for a company that will let you install firefox but no extensions or addons??

        fml

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          We handle a lot of IP so I can’t install anything on the PC that isn’t pre-approved (like MS Teams). I am able to add certain extensions like Ublock but not others like Keepa (Amazon price tracker).

  • raldone01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I don’t understand why all these chrome derivatives and firefox don’t just band together and extend manifest v3 with some vendored standardised extension that addresses the limitations.

    Browsers do that for CSS and JavaScript features already. An extension could just check if the browser supports the “unlimited filters” option and use it if its available.

    I have never researched it but heard that the permissions of manifest v3 are much better for privacy.

    I am in favor of removing manifest v2 if the vendored extension becomes a reality.

    Browsers already have too much complexity, lines of code and feature creep.

      • bizarroland@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I used it for a while. It honestly was a really good browser for a long time but since everything started going this shit it quickly fell from my good graces.

        The only time I even think of missing it is when I have to open a page that is optimized against Firefox on purpose because the developers decided to use some janky Javascript plugin and didn’t test.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Sad saga, but here we are. I remember when Chrome was new and brought much needed speed and low resource usage to the browsing experience of the day. I even got email from a Chrome engineer once about a bug I mentioned in a forum, asking me for more information.

      Google was already an ad company by then so anyone could have looked forward to this inevitability. Some did. Most of us did not.

      Chrome has just always been there for some younger people but it will now live in my memory as a fully encapsulated end-to-end enshittification experience that I really should have always expected.

      And just like it used to be with Internet Explorer, I am forced to use Chrome at work all day because thats the IT & security approved / enterprise-managed browser.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Imagine having an OS that doesn’t come with a proper package manager (and Firefox installed by default, for that matter).

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Just like how Micro$oft Windows is advertsiting Linux, Google Chrome advertsites Firefox!

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s totally ok. I’ve phased Chrome out in the beginning of the year already.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve been dual welding browsers since chrome came out. The second they started talking about deprecating manifest 2, I test drove Vivaldi and Brave. Now they’re set up as my second.

    I tried to convert over to Libwolf, But it absolutely massacres my passkeys.

    I plan to main Firefox until they do something stupid which I think is inevitable with their recent statements.

    I’m just hoping that by the time The other Firefox shoe drops there will be something else viable on the market. I don’t know how long Brave and Vivaldi can hold out with chromium changing underneath them

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wouldn’t trust Brave as it has a poor track record for privacy and is often used as a crypto miner behind the scenes.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s a fairly long time ago now and the crypto token crap is off by default. As far as I know they are the only browser with a paid development team that is trying to combat YouTube ads. And they’re blocking technique is unique amongst the options we have. If it comes down to using Brave for YouTube, I have no problem with doing that.

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    the company said it would start turning off Manifest V2 extensions

    …in time for Black Friday & the holiday sales?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have always used Firefox on all my devices, except for one: the Chromebook I was forced to buy because of compatibility with my college’s test proctoring spyware.

    On that device, not only did uBlock Origin quit working the other day, but today Chrome even kept disabling uBlock Lite with the error message that “This extension reloaded itself too frequently”. It could be some kind of legitimate bug, but it sure feels a lot like foul play on Google’s part.

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Chrome is the adblock-block? You might have outblocked me today, but I’ll firefox you away!

  • intro@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I stopped using adblockers and simply set the entire operating system to use Mullvad’s DNS over HTTPS/TLS, specifically the adblock.dns.mullvad.net option. It doesn’t have all the other uBlock features, but all ads are blocked in all browsers.

    • micka190@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The big problem with DNS-based ad-blocking is that it doesn’t prevent redirects. Sure, you’ll get redirected to a harmless blank page, but then you need to go back to the previous page. You don’t have that issue with uBlock.

      • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It also doesn’t prevent advertisements carried through the website’s own domain. For example, lots of video platforms send their advertisements through the same domain as the content’s domain, so if you block that domain, you’ll also block the possibility of watching any content there. That’s why you need to have ad-blocking within the browser.

  • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I frequently forget that chrome is installed on my phone. The only time I’m forced to use it is about once a year when I order Papa John’s Pizza takeout. Their checkout page doesn’t seem to work in any other browser.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We got here by using their softslop… only way to kill them is now to move on to different merchants. deny parasite the profits.

    Gaming 101

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’d be great if Cloudflare sites supported Firefox. No matter what I do, it always gives me the “prove you’re a human” checkbox loop.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Interesting. I use Firefox on everything at home, usually windows or android, and I rarely get those. Could it be one of your extensions? Proxy?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No proxy. I’ve tried disabling the likely extensions with no change. It’s not the builtin anti-tracking stuff, either.