• SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Optical discs are not really meant for longterm storage on their own. Disc rot is a real thing.

    Edit: I should have gone into a bit more detail. Yes, optical storage discs CAN be okay for longer term storage. But it depends on quite a few factors. The material itself has to be long lasting, the manufacturer has to have good quality control, and the end client should store it in a controlled environment. It’s it better or worse than alternatives. No idea without the actual data. It certainly has better density.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        recently fixed

        No, not really. Generally as a product ages the quality control goes down since demand isn’t there. You can make archival grade CDs that will last a life time, it just costs too much money for anyone to want to pay for it. Plus business have tape which is plenty good for long term storage.

        • s0ckpuppet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I wonder if in the context of storing 200 TB whether the added cost now makes sense given what a comparable SSD or HDD equivalent would run.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            SSDs aren’t great for long term archival since the nand needs to periodically be refreshed. You can build a better SSD, but that compromises storage capacity. HDDs are better, but they have other issues from sitting around not being used. Disks like these are a pretty good backup method if produced correctly. If is the big key, 100 layers sounds like a lot of layers to manufacture correctly, and you won’t know your dat is gone until it’s unreadable.

            But will it be able to replace tape for long term backup? LTO 9 is supposedly available, and up to 18TB not compressed. LTO-10 is 36, and supposedly LTO-14 is going to be 576 TB but that seems overly ambitious.

            • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Also LTO is rather expensive, way out of range for the home archivist. Discs tend to be much cheaper! Hopefully this is the case for these as well.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      *Some optical discs. Others not so much, it’s not an inevitability… M-DISC, introduced in 2009, has a rating with proper storage of one THOUSAND years. They are even readable and writable by most regular DVD/Blueray drives!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-DISC

      I absolutely cannot wait for these new discs to be available!